Difference between Protocol Deviation and Protocol Violation
Protocol Violation- A protocol violation is a deviation from the IRB approved protocol that may affect the subject's rights, safety, or well being and/or the completeness, accuracy and reliability of the study data.
If the deviation meets any of the following criteria, it is considered a protocol violation.
I. The deviation has harmed or posed a significant or substantive risk of harm to the research subject.
Examples:
• A research subject received the wrong treatment or incorrect dose.
• A research subject met withdrawal criteria during the study but was not withdrawn.
• A research subject received an excluded concomitant medication.
II. The deviation compromises the scientific integrity of the data collected for the study.
Examples:
• A research subject was enrolled but does not meet the protocol's eligibility criteria.
• Failure to treat research subjects per protocol procedures that specifically relate to primary efficacy outcomes. (if it involves patient safety it meets the first category above)
III. The deviation is a willful or knowing breach of human subject protection regulations, policies, or procedures on the part of the investigator(s).
Examples:
• Failure to obtain informed consent prior to initiation of study-related procedures
IV. The deviation involves a serious or continuing noncompliance with federal, state, local or institutional human subject protection regulations, policies, or procedures.
Examples:
• Working under an expired professional license or certification
V. The deviation is inconsistent with the NIH Human Research Protection Program’s research, medical, and ethical principles.
Examples:
• A breach of confidentiality.
Source: http://www.genome.gov/Pages/Research/Intramural/IRB/Deviation_Violation_examples8-07.pdf
No comments:
Post a Comment